<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" >

<channel>
	<title>Relationships &#8211; Benjamin Fry</title>
	<atom:link href="https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/tag/relationships/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://benjaminfry.co.uk</link>
	<description>Relationships &#38; Trauma Expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 20:03:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Your Nervous System Is Not the Enemy &#8211; Understanding Reactions in Relationships</title>
		<link>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/your-nervous-system-is-not-the-enemy-understanding-reactions-in-relationships/</link>
					<comments>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/your-nervous-system-is-not-the-enemy-understanding-reactions-in-relationships/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Fry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Nervous System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous System Dysregulation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://benjaminfry.co.uk/?p=2698</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Relationships often reveal parts of us that we didn’t know were there. A small misunderstanding can suddenly escalate into anger, withdrawal, or deep anxiety. A partner’s silence might feel like rejection, and a critical comment can spark defensiveness that seems disproportionate to the moment. Afterwards, many people feel confused or ashamed. Why did I react [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Relationships often reveal parts of us that we didn’t know were there. A small misunderstanding can suddenly escalate into anger, withdrawal, or deep anxiety. A partner’s silence might feel like rejection, and a critical comment can spark defensiveness that seems disproportionate to the moment.</p>
<p>Afterwards, many people feel confused or ashamed. <i>Why did I react like that?</i> <i>Why couldn’t I stay calm?</i></p>
<p>But these reactions are rarely random. Beneath them lies a powerful biological system that’s working constantly to protect us: the nervous system. When we begin to understand how this system operates, particularly in the context of past experience and attachment, our responses in relationships start to make much more sense (<a href="https://archive.org/details/polyvagaltheoryn0000porg" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Porges, 2011;</a> <a href="https://ia601604.us.archive.org/35/items/the-body-keeps-the-score-pdf/The-Body-Keeps-the-Score-PDF.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Van der Kolk, 2014</a>).</p>
<p>Rather than being an obstacle to connection, the nervous system is often actually trying to preserve it.</p>
<h2><b>The Body Is Always Listening for Safety</b></h2>
<p>Human beings are biologically wired to detect safety or threat in their surroundings. Long before the thinking mind has evaluated a situation, the nervous system is already scanning for cues in tone of voice, facial expression, posture, and distance.</p>
<p>If the body senses safety, it allows us to remain open, curious, and socially engaged. If it detects a potential threat, it prepares us to protect ourselves.</p>
<p>This process happens automatically and extremely quickly. It is governed by the autonomic nervous system, which regulates states of calm engagement, mobilisation (fight or flight), or shutdown. As described in the work of polyvagal theory, these shifts occur through unconscious neural processes designed to ensure survival (<a href="https://archive.org/details/polyvagaltheoryn0000porg" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Porges, 2011</a>).</p>
<p>In relational situations, the nervous system often responds not just to what is happening now, but to what the moment <i>resembles</i> from the past (<a href="https://archive.org/details/inunspokenvoiceh0000levi" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Levine, 2010</a>; <a href="https://ia601604.us.archive.org/35/items/the-body-keeps-the-score-pdf/The-Body-Keeps-the-Score-PDF.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Van der Kolk, 2014</a>).</p>
<p>The reaction may seem excessive in the present moment, but to the nervous system, it can feel like a familiar signal of danger.</p>
<h2><b>The Invisible Triggers Beneath Reactions</b></h2>
<p>Many emotional reactions in relationships are driven by processes that operate below conscious awareness. The body stores patterns of response that were learned in earlier environments, especially during periods of vulnerability or stress (<a href="https://ia601604.us.archive.org/35/items/the-body-keeps-the-score-pdf/The-Body-Keeps-the-Score-PDF.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Van der Kolk, 2014</a>).</p>
<p>When a current situation echoes those earlier experiences, the nervous system may activate protective responses automatically. These reactions often appear as anger, anxiety, defensiveness, withdrawal, or emotional overwhelm.</p>
<p>In trauma-informed perspectives, these responses are not viewed as signs of weakness or dysfunction, they are understood as adaptive strategies the body developed in order to cope (<a href="https://archive.org/details/inunspokenvoiceh0000levi" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Levine, 2010</a>).</p>
<p>Trauma is like an <i>Invisible Lion.</i> The nervous system reacts as though a threat is present, even when the conscious mind knows that the situation is not life-threatening. The body is responding to a perceived danger signal, not necessarily to the objective reality of the moment <a href="https://benjaminfry.co.uk/the-invisible-lion/">(Fry, 2019).</a></p>
<p>When people recognise that their reactions are rooted in protective biology rather than personal failure, the experience can become less confusing and more compassionate.</p>
<h2><b>Attachment Shapes How the Nervous System Interprets Connection</b></h2>
<p>Attachment theory provides another important piece of the puzzle. Early relationships with caregivers play a central role in shaping how the nervous system interprets closeness, distance, and emotional communication.</p>
<p>When caregivers are reliably responsive and attuned, the developing nervous system learns that connection is generally safe. Emotional distress can be soothed through the presence of another person, and the body learns how to return to balance (<a href="https://www.academia.edu/45262427/Affect_Regulation_and_the_Repair_of_the_Self" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Schore, 2003)</a>.</p>
<p>When early relationships are inconsistent, unpredictable, or frightening, the nervous system may develop heightened sensitivity to relational cues. A small change in tone or attention may be interpreted as a signal that connection is at risk <a href="https://ia800205.us.archive.org/5/items/attachmentlossvo00john/attachmentlossvo00john.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">(Bowlby, 1969).</a></p>
<p>These patterns do not remain confined to childhood. They often continue to influence adult relationships, shaping expectations about closeness, rejection, and safety.</p>
<p>This is why certain relational situations can feel so emotionally intense. The nervous system may be responding not only to the present interaction but also to earlier experiences that formed its template for connection.</p>
<h2><b>The Power of Co-Regulation</b></h2>
<p>Although many people assume emotional regulation is purely an individual skill, nervous systems are deeply relational. Humans regulate one another constantly through subtle signals of safety and reassurance (<a href="https://archive.org/details/polyvagaltheoryn0000porg" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Porges, 2011</a>).</p>
<p>This process is known as co-regulation.</p>
<p>A calm tone of voice, gentle eye contact, steady pacing of conversation, and genuine responsiveness all communicate safety to another nervous system. These cues can help reduce stress responses and bring the body back toward balance.</p>
<p>In infancy, co-regulation is essential. A distressed baby relies entirely on a caregiver’s presence to return to calm. Over time, the nervous system gradually internalises these regulatory experiences (<a href="https://www.academia.edu/45262427/Affect_Regulation_and_the_Repair_of_the_Self" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Schore, 2003)</a>.</p>
<p>Yet this need does not disappear in adulthood. Supportive relationships continue to play a powerful role in stabilising the nervous system.</p>
<p>When conflict occurs in relationships, the ability to return to connection, to repair, reassure, and acknowledge emotional impact, helps restore safety. Repeated experiences of this kind allow the nervous system to update its expectations and gradually become less reactive to perceived threat (<a href="https://archive.org/details/polyvagaltheoryn0000porg" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Porges, 2011</a>).</p>
<h2><b>Boundaries as a Form of Safety</b></h2>
<p>Healthy relationships are not built on constant closeness alone. They also require clear boundaries.</p>
<p>Boundaries are often misunderstood as walls that separate people, but in reality, they create the conditions that allow connection to remain safe and nourishing. When we feel able to express limits, needs, and preferences, there is greater stability and clarity, which reduces the uncertainty that can otherwise trigger stress responses.</p>
<p>Seen from this perspective, boundaries are not acts of rejection. They are acts of regulation. They help maintain the emotional space in which authentic connection can exist.</p>
<h2><b>Moving from Self-Criticism to Curiosity</b></h2>
<p>One of the most transformative shifts people can make is moving from self-judgement to curiosity.</p>
<p>When a strong emotional reaction appears, the immediate impulse is often to criticise ourselves or the other person. But a more helpful question might be: <i>What signal of danger did my nervous system just detect?</i></p>
<p>This question opens the door to exploration rather than blame. It recognises that the body may be responding to something meaningful, even if the reaction seems disproportionate. By approaching these moments with curiosity, people often discover patterns rooted in earlier experiences of stress, loss, or relational uncertainty (<a href="https://ia601604.us.archive.org/35/items/the-body-keeps-the-score-pdf/The-Body-Keeps-the-Score-PDF.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Van der Kolk, 2014</a>).</p>
<p>Awareness alone does not instantly dissolve these patterns. But it creates space for new responses to emerge.</p>
<h2><b>Relearning Safety in Relationship</b></h2>
<p>Healing relational reactivity is not about suppressing emotions or forcing calmness. Instead, it involves gradually helping the nervous system relearn what safety feels like.</p>
<p>This process often unfolds through repeated experiences of connection where conflict can occur without leading to abandonment, criticism, or emotional shutdown. Repair, empathy, and responsiveness become crucial.</p>
<p>Over time, the nervous system begins to update its predictions about relationships (<a href="https://archive.org/details/polyvagaltheoryn0000porg" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Porges, 2011;</a> <a href="https://www.academia.edu/45262427/Affect_Regulation_and_the_Repair_of_the_Self" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Schore, 2003</a>). Situations that once triggered intense alarm may begin to feel less threatening. The body learns that not every raised voice means rejection, and that not every disagreement means the end of connection.</p>
<h2><b>The Nervous System as an Ally</b></h2>
<p>At first glance, the nervous system may appear to be the source of relational problems. Its reactions can feel disruptive, overwhelming, or unpredictable. But when we look more closely, we see something different.</p>
<p>The nervous system is trying, often desperately, to protect connection, dignity, and emotional safety. Its responses are rooted in survival mechanisms that evolved to keep us alive and bonded to others (<a href="https://archive.org/details/polyvagaltheoryn0000porg" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Porges, 2011</a>).</p>
<p>When we approach these reactions with understanding rather than hostility, a new relationship with our internal experience becomes possible. Instead of fighting the nervous system, we can learn to listen to it. And in doing so, we begin to create the conditions in which both the body and our relationships can gradually move toward greater safety, resilience, and connection.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<p>Bowlby, J. (1969). <i>Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1 – Attachment.</i> Basic Books. https://ia800205.us.archive.org/5/items/attachmentlossvo00john/attachmentlossvo00john.pdf</p>
<p>Fry, B. (2019). <i>The Invisible Lion: How to Tame Your Nervous System and Reclaim Your Power.</i> Watkins Publishing. https://benjaminfry.co.uk/the-invisible-lion/</p>
<p>Levine, P. (2010). <i>In an Unspoken Voice: How the Body Releases Trauma and Restores Goodness.</i> North Atlantic Books. https://archive.org/details/inunspokenvoiceh0000levi</p>
<p>Porges, S. W. (2011). <i>The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation.</i> W. W. Norton &amp; Company. https://archive.org/details/polyvagaltheoryn0000porg</p>
<p>Schore, A. N. (2003). <i>Affect Regulation and the Repair of the Self.</i> W. W. Norton &amp; Company. https://www.academia.edu/45262427/Affect_Regulation_and_the_Repair_of_the_Self</p>
<p>Van der Kolk, B. (2014). <i>The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma.</i> Viking. https://ia601604.us.archive.org/35/items/the-body-keeps-the-score-pdf/The-Body-Keeps-the-Score-PDF.pdf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/your-nervous-system-is-not-the-enemy-understanding-reactions-in-relationships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wired for Survival, Longing for Connection: How Attachment Styles Play Out in Adult Love</title>
		<link>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/wired-for-survival-longing-for-connection-how-attachment-styles-play-out-in-adult-love/</link>
					<comments>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/wired-for-survival-longing-for-connection-how-attachment-styles-play-out-in-adult-love/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Fry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Attachment Styles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://benjaminfry.co.uk/?p=2682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As soon as we are born, we inherently learn to relate to others in order to survive. Before we start to use language, before we can think our way through experiences, we feel our way through it. The nervous system, exquisitely sensitive, reads the world not in words but in safety and danger, closeness and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="2682" class="elementor elementor-2682" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-a5cdb99 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="a5cdb99" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-fc8c391 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="fc8c391" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As soon as we are born, we inherently learn to relate to others in order to survive. Before we start to use language, before we can think our way through experiences, we feel our way through it. The nervous system, exquisitely sensitive, reads the world not in words but in safety and danger, closeness and distance, attunement and rupture. What we come to call </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">love </span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">in adulthood is, in many ways, the continuation of these early bodily negotiations. It is less a conscious choice than a deeply patterned response, shaped by our earliest bonds.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Attachment is not simply about how we relate to others, but about how our nervous system has learned to survive.</span></p><p><b>The Nervous System &#8211; Love as a State, Not a Concept</b></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Much of what unfolds in adult relationships is not driven by conscious intention but by the autonomic nervous system. </span><a href="https://archive.org/details/polyvagaltheoryn0000porg" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Stephen Porges’ Polyvagal Theory</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> offers a lens through which we can understand this more deeply. Our nervous system continuously scans for cues of safety or threat, shaping whether we move towards connection, into fight or flight, or into collapse.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">When we feel safe, we enter what Deb Dana calls the “ventral vagal state,” where connection feels safe and therefore possible. We can make eye contact, listen, and feel the warmth of another person’s presence. But when the nervous system detects danger, often based on past experiences rather than present reality, it shifts. We may become anxious, hypervigilant, or withdrawn. These responses are not choices but adaptive strategies.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In intimate relationships, this means that moments of closeness can paradoxically activate fear. A partner’s silence might be interpreted as abandonment. A request for space might feel like rejection. The body reacts before the mind can intervene. We are not simply responding to the person in front of us, but are constantly responding to an entire history encoded in our physiology.</span></p><p><b>Attachment Patterns &#8211; The Echo of Early Bonds</b></p><p><a href="https://ia800205.us.archive.org/5/items/attachmentlossvo00john/attachmentlossvo00john.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">John Bowlby</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> and </span><a href="https://archive.org/details/patternsofattach0000unse_g0x9/page/n3/mode/2up" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Mary Ainsworth</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> described attachment styles as patterns formed in early relationships with caregivers. These patterns, secure, anxious, avoidant, and disorganised, become templates for how we expect love to feel.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Anxious attachment often carries a deep longing for closeness, accompanied by a fear of loss. The nervous system is primed for inconsistency, scanning for signs of withdrawal. Avoidant attachment, by contrast, tends to associate closeness with overwhelm. Distance becomes a way of maintaining regulation, even if it comes at the cost of connection.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Disorganised attachment reflects a more complex experience, where the source of safety is also the source of fear. This creates a push-pull dynamic, a simultaneous longing for and fear of intimacy.</span></p><p><a href="https://archive.org/details/whenbodysaysnoco0000mate" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Gabor Maté</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> reminds us that these adaptations are not pathologies, but are intelligent responses to the environments in which they developed. As children, we are faced with an impossible dilemma between authenticity and attachment. When those two needs come into conflict, attachment almost always wins. We learn to shape ourselves in ways that preserve connection, even if it means disconnecting from our own needs.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In adulthood, these adaptations can become rigid. What once protected us now constrains us. The strategies that ensure survival can undermine intimacy.</span></p><p><b>Trauma &#8211; When the Past Lives in the Present</b></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Trauma is not only what happened, but it is also what remains unresolved in the body. </span><a href="https://ia601604.us.archive.org/35/items/the-body-keeps-the-score-pdf/The-Body-Keeps-the-Score-PDF.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bessel van der Kolk</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> speaks of trauma as something that is “remembered” not just cognitively, but somatically. The body keeps the score.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In relationships, this means that seemingly small interactions can activate disproportionate responses. Reactions such as a raised voice, a delayed message or a change in tone can trigger states of alarm or shutdown. The nervous system does not distinguish between past and present, but responds to perceived threat.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is why many couples find themselves caught in repetitive cycles. One partner pursues, the other withdraws. One escalates, the other shuts down. Each is responding not only to the other but to the echoes of earlier experiences.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Understanding this shifts the narrative from blame to compassion. Rather than asking, “What is wrong with you?” we begin to ask, “What happened to you?” and, more importantly, “What is happening in your nervous system right now?”</span></p><p><b>Boundaries &#8211; The Bridge Between Self and Other</b></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Healthy relationships require boundaries, yet for many, boundaries are fraught with difficulty. If early experiences taught us that our needs were unwelcome or unsafe, we may struggle to assert them. We may overextend, seeking approval, or withdraw entirely to avoid vulnerability.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Boundaries are not walls, but necessary points of contact. They define where one person ends, and another begins, allowing for genuine connection rather than enmeshment or isolation.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">From a nervous system perspective, boundaries help create safety. When we can say no, when we can express our needs without fear of rejection, the body relaxes. We are no longer in survival mode, and we can engage from a place of choice. Boundaries are both cognitive decisions and embodied experiences. When we learn to listen to the subtle signals of discomfort or ease, we begin to act in ways that support our regulation.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is not about rigid rules but about attunement, to ourselves and to others.</span></p><p><b>Co-Regulation &#8211; Healing in Relationship</b></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">While much of our conditioning occurs in relationship to others, so too does our healing. Humans are not designed to regulate in isolation. We are social beings, wired for co-regulation.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Co-regulation refers to the way our nervous systems influence each other. A calm, grounded presence can help soothe an activated system. Eye contact, tone of voice, and physical proximity all contribute to a sense of safety.</span></p><p><a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-26630-000" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Deb Dana</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> describes this as “borrowing” another’s nervous system. When we cannot access regulation on our own, we can find it through connection. This is particularly important in intimate relationships, where the stakes feel high, and the triggers are often close to the surface.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">However, co-regulation requires awareness. If both partners are dysregulated, they may amplify each other’s distress. Learning to recognise one’s own state and to communicate it becomes essential and very powerful.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is where compassion becomes transformative. When we can see our partner’s reactions not as attacks but as expressions of nervous system activation, we create space for something different. We move from reactivity to responsiveness and acceptance. </span></p><p><b>Healing &#8211; From Survival to Connection</b></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Healing is not about eliminating our attachment patterns but about bringing awareness to them. It is about expanding our capacity to stay present, even when the nervous system is activated.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This involves developing what Porges calls “neuroception of safety”, which is the ability to recognise when we are safe, even if our body initially says otherwise. It means learning to track our internal states, to notice when we are moving into fight, flight, or freeze, and to gently guide ourselves back to connection.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Practices that support regulation, such as breathwork, movement, and mindfulness, can be helpful. But equally important is the relational context. Safe, attuned relationships provide the conditions for new experiences. They allow the nervous system to learn that closeness does not have to mean danger.</span></p><p><a href="https://ia601504.us.archive.org/23/items/the-myth-of-normal-by-gabor-mate/The%20Myth%20of%20Normal%20by%20Gabor%20Mate.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Gabor Maté</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> speaks of the possibility of “compassionate inquiry,” a way of exploring our patterns with curiosity rather than judgment. This shift is crucial. Shame keeps us stuck, whereas compassion opens the door to change.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Over time, as we experience safety in new ways, our patterns begin to soften. We become less reactive and more flexible. We can tolerate the discomfort of vulnerability without collapsing or defending against it.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We begin to experience love not as a threat to survival but as a source of nourishment.</span></p><p><b>The Paradox of Intimacy</b></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">At its core, the challenge of adult love is a paradox. We are wired for survival, yet we long for connection. The very strategies that keep us safe can also keep us alone.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Moving towards intimacy requires courage. It asks us to stay present with sensations that once signalled danger. It asks us to risk being seen, to set boundaries, to remain open in the face of uncertainty.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But it also offers the possibility of something profoundly healing. When we can bring awareness to our nervous system, when we can meet ourselves and our partners with compassion, we create the conditions for a different kind of relationship, one that is not driven solely by the past, but shaped by the present.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In this space, love becomes less about managing fear and more about experiencing connection. Not perfectly, not without rupture, but with a growing capacity to return to one another.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">And perhaps this is the essence of healing, not the absence of activation, but the ability to find our way back to safety, again and again, in the presence of another.</span></p><p> </p><p><b>References</b></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1978). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Erlbaum. https://archive.org/details/patternsofattach0000unse_g0x9/page/n3/mode/2up</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bowlby, J. (1969). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Basic Books.https://ia800205.us.archive.org/5/items/attachmentlossvo00john/attachmentlossvo00john.pdf</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Dana, D. (2018). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Polyvagal Theory in Therapy: Engaging the Rhythm of Regulation</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. W. W. Norton. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-26630-000</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Maté, G. (2019). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">When the Body Says No: The Cost of Hidden Stress</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Vintage. https://archive.org/details/whenbodysaysnoco0000mate</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Maté, G. (2022). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Myth of Normal: Trauma, Illness, and Healing in a Toxic Culture</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Vermilion. https://ia601504.us.archive.org/23/items/the-myth-of-normal-by-gabor-mate/The%20Myth%20of%20Normal%20by%20Gabor%20Mate.pdf</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Porges, S. W. (2011). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. W. W. Norton. https://archive.org/details/polyvagaltheoryn0000porg</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">van der Kolk, B. (2014). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Viking. https://ia601604.us.archive.org/35/items/the-body-keeps-the-score-pdf/The-Body-Keeps-the-Score-PDF.pdf</span></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/wired-for-survival-longing-for-connection-how-attachment-styles-play-out-in-adult-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Early Trauma Makes Emotional Safety Feel Unfamiliar, and How That Can Change</title>
		<link>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/how-early-trauma-makes-emotional-safety-feel-unfamiliar-and-how-that-can-change/</link>
					<comments>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/how-early-trauma-makes-emotional-safety-feel-unfamiliar-and-how-that-can-change/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Fry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Trauma Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://benjaminfry.co.uk/?p=2675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When we think about emotional safety, many of us imagine a very natural, warm and grounded feeling. It’s like something we trust will just be there. But for people whose early childhood was shaped by unpredictable caregivers, neglect, or harm, emotional safety can feel very foreign. Early trauma doesn’t just leave memories. It leaves marks [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="2675" class="elementor elementor-2675" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-787c54a e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="787c54a" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-f8a8069 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="f8a8069" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">When we think about emotional safety, many of us imagine a very natural, warm and grounded feeling. It’s like something we trust will just be there. But for people whose early childhood was shaped by unpredictable caregivers, neglect, or harm, emotional safety can feel very foreign. Early trauma doesn’t just leave memories. It leaves marks on the nervous system, on relationships, and on the internal sense of safety. Understanding why emotional safety feels unfamiliar and learning how that pattern can shift invites compassion, curiosity, and psychologically-informed healing.</span></p><h2><b>When the Nervous System Learns Danger First</b></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Trauma is not just something that happens to a person, but is something the body remembers. Peter A. Levine, a trauma expert and author of </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Waking the Tiger</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">, argues that trauma is “a life experience that overwhelms the nervous system” (</span><a href="https://archive.org/details/wakingtigerheali00levi" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Levine, 1997</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">). In early life, when a caregiver is meant to be a safe source of comfort but instead is unpredictable, harsh, or absent, the nervous system doesn’t get the stable responses that it so needs to learn safety.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The nervous system learns through experience. When a baby cries and is consistently soothed, the nervous system learns how to calm down. When a child is afraid and left alone or punished for distress, the nervous system can learn that safety is unreliable. Stephen Porges’ Polyvagal Theory helps us make sense of this. Porges describes how the autonomic nervous system shifts between different states of regulation, such as safety, mobilisation (fight or flight), and shutdown (freeze), depending on cues of danger or safety in the environment (</span><a href="https://archive.org/details/polyvagaltheoryn0000porg" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Porges, 2011</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">). Early trauma makes the nervous system act with vigilance and defence, even in safe settings.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In practical terms, this means that someone who experienced trauma might perceive social cues differently. A neutral expression might feel cold, a gentle correction might feel threatening, a sigh might feel pointed, and silence might feel like rejection. Here, the nervous system is not malfunctioning, but is doing exactly what it learned to do, which is to protect you from further threat.</span></p><h2><b>Emotional Safety: A Learned Sense, Not a Born One</b></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We often talk about emotional safety as though it is something innate. But emotional safety is more like a language learned in early life, a language of connection, soothing, and attunement. Daniel J. Siegel, a clinical professor of psychiatry and author of </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Developing Mind</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">, emphasises that secure attachment in childhood fosters a coherent sense of self and mind (</span><a href="https://archive.org/details/developingmindho0000sieg" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Siegel, 1999</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">). Secure attachment emerges not just from care, but from attuned care, when the caregiver has the capacity to notice, respond, and regulate the child’s emotional states, in a balanced and healthy way. </span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">If early experiences taught someone that emotional signals are unpredictable or unsafe, an internal capacity to be open and vulnerable may not have formed. Emotional safety in relationships might feel foreign, but this doesn’t mean that the person is incapable of emotional safety. It just means that their internal roadmap was never fully drafted.</span></p><h2><b>Boundaries as a Bridge to Safety</b></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">When emotional safety feels unfamiliar, healthy boundaries can feel confusing, too. Boundaries are often misunderstood as rigid walls, but at their core, boundaries help us communicate our needs and protect our well-being. Bessel van der Kolk, author of </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Body Keeps the Score</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">, illustrates how trauma affects not only the mind but the body’s sense of agency, and the ability to feel that “I am in control of my actions and responses” (</span><a href="https://ia601604.us.archive.org/35/items/the-body-keeps-the-score-pdf/The-Body-Keeps-the-Score-PDF.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">van der Kolk, 2014</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">). Boundaries are an expression of that agency.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">For someone whose early life lacked consistent safety, boundaries may at first feel like selfishness or rejection. That’s because the nervous system learned to equate self-protection with danger. If keeping the peace was once necessary to stay safe or loved, saying “no” can feel less like self-care and more like risking abandonment. Healing involves teaching the nervous system to recognise that setting limits can stabilise, not threaten, connection. Over time, practising boundaries in safe relationships (not necessarily romantic ones) teaches the body that limits are signals of respect, not abandonment.</span></p><h2><b>Healing Happens Through Regulation, Not Just Reflection</b></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Talking through past experiences can help make sense of them, but healing from early trauma is not just an intellectual exercise. It involves retraining the nervous system to perceive safety differently. Somatic therapies emphasise exactly that by working with the body’s felt sense rather than only with thoughts. This principle is central to approaches like Somatic Experiencing (Peter A. Levine) and Sensorimotor Psychotherapy </span><a href="https://archive.org/details/traumabodysensor0000ogde" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Pat Ogden)</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">. These approaches help people notice physical sensations, become aware of internal reactions, and develop new patterns of regulation.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nervous system regulation doesn’t mean suppressing emotion. Regulation means having the capacity to tolerate, process, and recover from emotional states. Porges’ Polyvagal Theory offers tools for this by helping people understand how different states of the nervous system show up in the body, for example, shallow breathing when anxious or numbness when overwhelmed, and how intentional practices like breath work, slow movement, and social engagement cues can shift states toward felt safety.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A regulated nervous system creates internal space. In that space, reflection becomes grounded. What once felt like chaos can become a sequence of sensations to observe and respond to. This creates the foundation for emotional safety that feels familiar rather than foreign.</span></p><h2><b>Relationships as Repair</b></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Healing from early trauma doesn’t happen in isolation. Secure, attuned relationships, where someone listens, responds, and can return to connection after tension, create healing experiences. This idea comes from attachment theory and is supported by decades of research showing that relational experiences shape the brain throughout life.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">For many people, therapy is one of the first environments where consistent attunement happens. Therapists trained in relational and trauma-informed approaches understand that emotional safety is built gradually. The therapist’s consistent presence, empathic responses, and patience teach the nervous system what safety feels like in real time.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Beyond therapy, supportive friendships and partnerships help reinforce these patterns. When others respect boundaries, respond to distress without judgment, and communicate openly, the nervous system receives repeated messages that emotional safety isn’t a mirage, but is something that can exist here and now.</span></p><h2><b>The Path from Unfamiliar to Familiar</b></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">If emotional safety feels unfamiliar, it’s important to understand that this is not a personal failure. It is the echo of early systems that were doing their best with limited resources. The nervous system adapted to protect, and those adaptations served a purpose. Healing does not require erasing these adaptations but integrating them into a larger sense of safety, agency, and connection.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Emotional safety becomes familiar through repeated experience, not just through thinking about it. It develops in relationships that are consistent and through boundaries that reinforce self-worth. Practising strategies for nervous system regulation teaches the body and mind how to move from survival into presence. Crucially, it also builds a compassionate understanding that progress is not linear. There will be setbacks, but with repetition and support, lasting change is possible.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Trauma changes the internal landscape, but it does not determine the entire terrain. With patience, support, and intentional practices, the nervous system can learn new patterns. Emotional safety can transition from something we can only imagine to something we recognise in our bodies, our relationships, and our everyday lives.</span></p><p> </p><h2><b>References</b></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Levine, P. A. (1997). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. North Atlantic Books. https://archive.org/details/wakingtigerheali00levi</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Porges, S. W. (2011). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, Self-Regulation</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. W. W. Norton &amp; Company. https://archive.org/details/polyvagaltheoryn0000porg</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Siegel, D. J. (1999). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Guilford Press. https://archive.org/details/developingmindho0000sieg</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">van der Kolk, B. (2014). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Viking. https://ia601604.us.archive.org/35/items/the-body-keeps-the-score-pdf/The-Body-Keeps-the-Score-PDF.pdf</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Ogden, P., Minton, K., &amp; Pain, C. (2006). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Trauma and the Body: A Sensorimotor Approach to Psychotherapy</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">. W. W. Norton &amp; Company. https://archive.org/details/traumabodysensor0000ogde</span></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/how-early-trauma-makes-emotional-safety-feel-unfamiliar-and-how-that-can-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Relationships Adrift: How Trauma Can Stifle Communication and How to Build Space for Healthy Conflict</title>
		<link>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/relationships-adrift-how-trauma-can-stifle-communication-and-how-to-build-space-for-healthy-conflict/</link>
					<comments>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/relationships-adrift-how-trauma-can-stifle-communication-and-how-to-build-space-for-healthy-conflict/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Fry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2025 09:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attachment Styles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinician Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous System Dysregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polyvagal Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapy Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vagus Nerve]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.benjaminfry.co.uk/?p=1663</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In our closest relationships, communication is often described as the lifeforce that sustains connection, understanding, and intimacy. Yet, for many, trauma can disrupt this vital flow, leaving partners feeling disconnected, misunderstood, or emotionally adrift. Trauma, especially when unaddressed, can stifle communication in profound ways—manifesting as withdrawal, reactivity, or even avoidance of conflict altogether. Understanding how [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our closest relationships, communication is often described as the lifeforce that sustains connection, understanding, and intimacy. Yet, for many, trauma can disrupt this vital flow, leaving partners feeling disconnected, misunderstood, or emotionally adrift. Trauma, especially when unaddressed, can stifle communication in profound ways—manifesting as withdrawal, reactivity, or even avoidance of conflict altogether. Understanding how trauma impacts relational dynamics and learning to build safe spaces for healthy conflict are crucial steps toward healing and deeper connection.</p>
<h3>The Hidden Weight of Trauma in Relationships</h3>
<p>Trauma, broadly defined as overwhelming experiences that exceed an individual’s capacity to cope, is rarely contained solely within the individual. As Judith Herman, a foundational trauma expert, explains in <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-30136-000" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Trauma and Recovery (1992)</a>, trauma shatters a person’s sense of safety and trust, impairing their ability to regulate emotions and relate to others in healthy ways. This disruption inevitably affects intimate relationships, which rely heavily on trust and vulnerability.</p>
<p>Peter Levine, known for his work in somatic experiencing, emphasises how trauma lives in the body, not just the mind. In <a href="https://www.northatlanticbooks.com/shop/waking-the-tiger-healing-trauma/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Waking the Tiger (1997)</a>, Levine argues that unresolved trauma dysregulates the nervous system, leading to hyperarousal or dissociation states that disrupt healthy and clear communication. When nervous system dysregulation occurs, even small disagreements can escalate into overwhelming conflict or emotional shutdown.</p>
<p>Bessel van der Kolk, author of <a href="https://ia601604.us.archive.org/35/items/the-body-keeps-the-score-pdf/The-Body-Keeps-the-Score-PDF.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Body Keeps the Score (2014)</a>, expands on this idea by showing how trauma reshapes brain function, particularly areas responsible for emotional regulation and social engagement. He notes that trauma survivors often struggle with emotional expression and attunement, which can create a vicious cycle of misunderstanding and conflict avoidance in relationships.</p>
<h3>How Trauma Stifles Communication</h3>
<p>In trauma-affected relationships, communication breakdown often emerges in three primary ways:</p>
<ol>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Hypervigilance and Reactivity: Trauma survivors may respond to perceived threats with intense fear or anger. This hypervigilance makes conflict feel unsafe, triggering defensive or aggressive behaviours that shut down dialogue.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Emotional Numbing and Dissociation: To avoid overwhelming feelings, some may disconnect from their emotions altogether, making it difficult to express needs or listen empathically.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Fear of Abandonment or Betrayal: Deep fears of rejection can cause individuals to either withdraw or cling excessively, neither of which supports healthy communication or conflict resolution.</li>
</ol>
<p>Gabor Maté, a leading expert on trauma and addiction, highlights the role of early attachment wounds in shaping these patterns. <a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2426971/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">In his work, Maté</a> asserts that trauma disrupts the essential emotional attunement between caregiver and child, which lays the groundwork for future relational capacities. When this foundation is shaky, adult relationships often replicate those early dynamics, marked by mistrust, miscommunication, and conflict avoidance.</p>
<h3>The Importance of Nervous System Regulation</h3>
<p>Central to healing trauma in relationships is the regulation of the nervous system. As Levine and van der Kolk both note, trauma keeps the nervous system “stuck” in fight, flight, or freeze responses. Before meaningful communication can occur, partners need to feel safe both internally and interpersonally.</p>
<p>Nervous system regulation can be cultivated through practices such as mindfulness, breathwork, somatic therapies, and grounding exercises. These techniques help shift the body out of survival mode and into a state of calm readiness, enabling clearer thinking and emotional availability.</p>
<p>Bessel van der Kolk underscores that “feeling safe” in the body is a prerequisite for emotional openness. When partners can co-regulate—help each other return to calm—there is greater space for honest dialogue and the processing of difficult emotions.</p>
<h3>Boundaries and Containment: Creating a Safe Space for Conflict</h3>
<p>Healing trauma and restoring communication also requires clear boundaries and containment within relationships. Boundaries serve as protective limits that ensure each person feels respected and safe. Judith Herman emphasises the need for containment—creating a relational “container” that holds distress without overwhelming either partner.</p>
<p>Containment involves setting limits around how conflict is expressed and agreeing on ways to pause and self-soothe when emotions run high. This safety framework allows both partners to engage with vulnerability without fearing mistreatment or abandonment.</p>
<p>Boundaries also empower trauma survivors by giving them control over their personal space and emotional availability, which is often compromised by trauma. According to Gabor Maté, establishing boundaries is a crucial act of self-care and healing, enabling individuals to differentiate their own feelings from their partner’s and avoid enmeshment.</p>
<h3>Building Space for Healthy Conflict</h3>
<p>Conflict, while often feared, is an inevitable and necessary part of intimate relationships. Healthy conflict allows for the expression of differing needs and perspectives, fostering growth and deeper understanding. For trauma-affected couples, building space for such conflict requires intentional strategies:</p>
<ol>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Prioritise Safety: Begin by creating an environment where both partners feel emotionally and physically safe. This might mean agreeing on “time-outs” when conflict becomes overwhelming or setting ground rules for respectful communication.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Practice Nervous System Awareness: Check in with your body during difficult conversations. If you notice signs of dysregulation (racing heart, shutting down), pause and use grounding techniques before continuing.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Use “I” Statements: Frame concerns in terms of your own feelings and needs rather than blaming or accusing. This reduces defensiveness and invites empathy.</li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1">Engage in Active Listening: Reflect back what you hear your partner say to ensure understanding and validate their experience.</li>
<li>Seek Professional Support: Trauma-informed therapy can guide couples in rebuilding trust and communication skills, helping partners navigate the complexities of trauma responses.</li>
</ol>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
<p>Trauma can feel like an invisible anchor weighing down relationships, stifling communication and making conflict seem like a dangerous minefield. Yet, with awareness and intention, couples can transform these challenges into opportunities for healing and growth.</p>
<p>By understanding the neurobiological impact of trauma as highlighted by Judith Herman, Peter Levine, Bessel van der Kolk, and Gabor Maté, partners can cultivate nervous system regulation, establish boundaries, and create containment. These foundational steps open the door to healthy conflict, where vulnerability is met with safety, and honest communication becomes the pathway to deeper connection.</p>
<p>Healing from trauma within relationships is not about avoiding conflict but learning to hold it with care, respect, and compassion. When partners commit to this work, relationships can move from adrift to anchored, from silence to dialogue, and from isolation to intimacy.</p>
<h3>References</h3>
<p>Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence—from Domestic Abuse to Political Terror. Basic Books.https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-30136-000</p>
<p>Levine, P. A. (1997). Waking the Tiger: Healing Trauma. North Atlantic Books.https://www.northatlanticbooks.com/shop/waking-the-tiger-healing-trauma/</p>
<p>van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Penguin Books. <a href="https://ia601604.us.archive.org/35/items/the-body-keeps-the-score-pdf/The-Body-Keeps-the-Score-PDF.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://ia601604.us.archive.org/35/items/the-body-keeps-the-score-pdf/The-Body-Keeps-the-Score-PDF.pdf</a></p>
<p>Maté, G. (2018). In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters with Addiction. North Atlantic Books. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2426971</p>


<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/relationships-adrift-how-trauma-can-stifle-communication-and-how-to-build-space-for-healthy-conflict/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Attachment Styles Influence Relationships: Disorganised</title>
		<link>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/how-attachment-styles-influence-relationships-disorganised/</link>
					<comments>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/how-attachment-styles-influence-relationships-disorganised/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Fry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2025 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Attachment Styles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinician Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous System Dysregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polyvagal Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapy Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vagus Nerve]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.benjaminfry.co.uk/?p=1515</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When it comes to human connection, attachment styles shape how we love and relate. Among the four main attachment styles—secure, anxious, avoidant, and disorganised—the disorganised attachment style is perhaps the most complex and misunderstood. This style, often rooted in early trauma, creates unique relational challenges that can affect intimacy, self-worth, and emotional regulation. Understanding disorganised [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="1515" class="elementor elementor-1515" data-elementor-post-type="post">
						<section class="elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-1c8d616 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default" data-id="1c8d616" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-4d469e6" data-id="4d469e6" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-5f459fe elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="5f459fe" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">When it comes to human connection, attachment styles shape how we love and relate. Among the four main attachment styles—secure, anxious, avoidant, and disorganised—the disorganised attachment style is perhaps the most complex and misunderstood. This style, often rooted in early trauma, creates unique relational challenges that can affect intimacy, self-worth, and emotional regulation. Understanding disorganised attachment and how to heal from it requires an integrated approach that addresses the mind and the body—particularly the nervous system. Boundaries and containment also play a crucial role in recovery and creating healthier relationships.</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">What Is Disorganised Attachment?</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Disorganised attachment, sometimes called “fearful-avoidant,” is characterised by a profound inner conflict: the need for connection is deeply felt, but so is a fear of intimacy. This attachment style often stems from childhood environments that were both a source of comfort and fear—such as those involving abuse, neglect, or inconsistent caregiving (</span><a href="https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1076926" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Main &amp; Solomon, 1986)</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Children in such environments may not develop a coherent strategy for seeking safety and closeness, leading to chaotic or contradictory behaviours in adult relationships.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In adulthood, individuals with disorganised attachment might alternate between clinging and distancing, struggle with trust, and have difficulty regulating emotions. These behaviours are not conscious choices but survival adaptations formed early in life. To understand and heal disorganised attachment, it is helpful to look at the role of the nervous system.</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Role of the Nervous System</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Trauma, especially relational trauma, imprints itself not only in our memories but also in our biology. According to The Polyvagal Theory</span><a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-04659-000" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (Porges, 2011)</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, the autonomic nervous system governs our responses to safety and threat. For people with disorganised attachment, the nervous system is often dysregulated—frequently shifting between sympathetic arousal (fight or flight) and dorsal vagal shutdown (freeze).</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This dysregulation means that even minor relational triggers can provoke seemingly overblown reactions: panic, dissociation, rage, or numbness. Nervous system regulation becomes crucial for healing because it helps individuals develop the capacity to stay present, tolerate emotional discomfort, and build secure connections over time.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Trauma-informed practices and techniques such as breathwork, somatic experiencing </span><a href="https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2656772" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Levine, 2010)</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, learning about triggers and vagus trauma-informed practices can support regulation. Importantly, working with a trauma-informed therapist can create a “co-regulating” relationship, helping the individual learn to calm their system in the presence of another—an essential skill for healthy attachment.</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Boundaries: A Path to Safety and Autonomy</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">People with disorganised attachment often struggle with boundaries, and often flit between being extremely close and firmly distant, either enmeshing with others or erecting rigid walls between them and their partner. This is a learned response: when safety in relationships has historically been unpredictable or dangerous, boundaries become blurred or defensive. However, healing requires relearning what it means to have—and respect—clear, consistent boundaries.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Boundaries are not just about saying “no” but also about knowing what we are responsible for and what we are not. This creates a sense of agency and autonomy, both essential for developing a secure self. Learning to set boundaries can feel threatening at first, especially if we fear abandonment or rejection, but with time, boundaries become a source of empowerment rather than disconnection.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Boundaries also create emotional safety, which is essential for nervous system regulation. When we know our limits and that they will be honoured, we can relax more fully into connection, reducing the fear and hypervigilance that so often accompany disorganised attachment.</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Containment: Holding Emotional Experience</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Containment, in the context of psychological healing, refers to the ability to “hold” emotional experience without becoming overwhelmed by it. For individuals with disorganised attachment, emotional intensity often feels like a flood—unmanageable and frightening. Without containment, emotions spill out in destructive ways or get buried deep, only to resurface later.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In therapy, containment is partly provided by the therapist, who models emotional regulation and offers a safe space to explore difficult feelings. Over time, the individual internalises this sense of safety, learning to “contain” themselves. This involves developing tools for self-soothing, reflection, and emotional expression that do not rely solely on others for stability.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Containment also intersects with nervous system work: when the body is regulated, the mind is better able to hold complexity without tipping into chaos. This capacity allows for deeper intimacy in relationships, as we are no longer driven by unconscious patterns of reactivity or avoidance.</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Healing Is Possible</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Healing from disorganised attachment is not linear, nor is it quick. It requires a multidimensional approach that includes relational, psychological, and somatic work. Central to this process is developing secure attachment—a state in which an individual, through therapy and self-awareness, develops the capacity for secure connection despite an insecure early environment </span><a href="https://colegiopspchubut.com.ar/storage/2024/09/Daniel-J.-Siegel-M.D.-The-Developing-Mind-Third-Edition_-How-Relationships-and-the-Brain-Interact-to-Shape-Who-We-Are.-Bonus-Brilliance-Audio-2020.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Siegel, 2010).</span></a></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Key elements of healing include:</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Therapeutic Relationships: A trauma-informed therapist provides a reparative experience, offering safety, consistency, and empathy.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nervous System Regulation: Techniques such as grounding, breathwork, and somatic therapy help build physiological resilience.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Clear Boundaries: Learning to identify and honor personal limits fosters autonomy and reduces relational chaos.</span></li>
<li style="font-weight: 400;" aria-level="1"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Emotional Containment: Developing the ability to process emotions without overwhelm increases self-trust and stability.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Each of these elements supports the others. For example, better regulation allows for clearer boundaries; clearer boundaries create space for containment; containment reduces reactivity in relationships. Over time, these practices lead to a greater sense of safety in the world and within oneself.</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">In Relationship: From Chaos to Coherence</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Disorganised attachment plays out most vividly in close relationships, where unresolved trauma meets the vulnerability of intimacy. But relationships can also be the safest and most important place to heal. With self-awareness and support, individuals can begin to choose differently—to pause before reacting, to speak their truth with kindness, and to offer themselves the compassion they may never have received.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is not about becoming perfect. Rather, it’s about becoming present. Healing disorganised attachment means becoming someone who can stay with their experience, who can regulate through difficulty, and who can relate to others from a place of authenticity and care.</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Embracing Transformation</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Disorganised attachment may be rooted in chaos, but it does not have to define our lives. Through nervous system regulation, the cultivation of healthy boundaries, and the development of emotional containment, healing becomes not just possible but transformative. The path from disorganisation to integration is one of courage—but it leads to a life of deeper connection, greater resilience, and true intimacy.</span></p>
<p></p>
<h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">References:</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=556378</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Main, M., &amp; Solomon, J. (1986). Discovery of an insecure-disorganized/disoriented attachment pattern: Procedures, findings and implications for the classification of behavior. In T. B. Brazelton, &amp; M. Yogman (Eds.), Affective development in infancy (pp. 95-124). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.&nbsp;<br></span><a href="https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1076926" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1076926</span></a></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Porges, S. W. (2011). </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation.</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> W W Norton &amp; Co.&nbsp;<br></span><a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-04659-000" style="font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-04659-000</a></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Levine, P. (2010) In an Unspoken Voice: How the Body Releases Trauma. North Atlantic Books, Berkeley.<br></span><a href="https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2656772" style="font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2656772</a></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Siegel, D. J. (2010). The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are. Guilford Press.<br></span><a href="https://colegiopspchubut.com.ar/storage/2024/09/Daniel-J.-Siegel-M.D.-The-Developing-Mind-Third-Edition_-How-Relationships-and-the-Brain-Interact-to-Shape-Who-We-Are.-Bonus-Brilliance-Audio-2020.pdf" style="font-style: inherit; font-weight: inherit; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://colegiopspchubut.com.ar/storage/2024/09/Daniel-J.-Siegel-M.D.-The-Developing-Mind-Third-Edition_-How-Relationships-and-the-Brain-Interact-to-Shape-Who-We-Are.-Bonus-Brilliance-Audio-2020.pdf</a></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/how-attachment-styles-influence-relationships-disorganised/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Attachment Styles Influence Relationships: Avoidant</title>
		<link>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/how-attachment-styles-influence-relationships-avoidant/</link>
					<comments>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/how-attachment-styles-influence-relationships-avoidant/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Fry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 14:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Attachment Styles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinician Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous System Dysregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polyvagal Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapy Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vagus Nerve]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.benjaminfry.co.uk/?p=1509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Attachment theory, developed by John Bowlby in the 1950s, gave us a map of how our early relationships shape the way we connect with others later in life. For people with avoidant attachment, early experiences of emotional unavailability can create a defence mechanism that lasts into adulthood (Bowlby, 1988). Avoidant individuals often distance themselves emotionally, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="1509" class="elementor elementor-1509" data-elementor-post-type="post">
						<section class="elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-0c639a4 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default" data-id="0c639a4" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-11a0644" data-id="11a0644" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-c700559 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="c700559" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Attachment theory, developed by John Bowlby in the 1950s, gave us a map of how our early relationships shape the way we connect with others later in life. For people with avoidant attachment, early experiences of emotional unavailability can create a defence mechanism that lasts into adulthood </span><a href="https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=556378" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Bowlby, 1988)</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Avoidant individuals often distance themselves emotionally, preferring to rely on themselves rather than risk being vulnerable. This behavioural pattern is not just an emotional response—it’s deeply connected to the regulation of their nervous system. And while healing from avoidant attachment might seem daunting, it’s absolutely possible through boundary-setting, nervous system regulation, and emotional containment.</span></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">What is Avoidant Attachment?</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The avoidant attachment style is a response to early caregivers who were emotionally unavailable or unresponsive. As babies, these children learned that their attempts for comfort were often ignored or met with indifference. In response, they adapted by suppressing their emotional needs and developing an internal belief that they could only rely on themselves.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As adults, the effects of this early experience show up as emotional distance in relationships. Avoidant individuals have a nervous system that’s conditioned to shut down during times of emotional distress. They may keep others at arm’s length, fearing that intimacy and emotional closeness will lead to hurt or disappointment </span><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2015-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Wardecker et al., 2016)</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">. This is a classic case of how a dysregulated nervous system, shaped by early attachment experiences, influences adult relationships </span><a href="https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1196/annals.1301.004" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Porges, 2003).</span></a></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Avoidant Attachment in Adult Relationships</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In relationships, people with avoidant attachment often seem cool, calm, and collected, but beneath that exterior, they are typically emotionally disconnected. They don’t lean on their partners for comfort and struggle to open up about their feelings. This emotional distance is a way of self-protecting, a shield formed to avoid the vulnerability that intimacy requires </span><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10047625/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Sagone, 2023).</span></a></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Here are some ways avoidant attachment manifests in relationships:</span></p><p><b>Emotional Distance:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Avoidant individuals often struggle to share their feelings. Their discomfort with vulnerability keeps them from expressing emotional needs or seeking support, even from a partner they love. Their nervous system, trained to stay closed off from emotional connection, might make it feel physically uncomfortable to engage deeply.</span></p><p><b>Prioritising Independence:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Because their caregivers were unavailable or unresponsive, avoidant individuals often value their independence above all else. They have a deep-seated fear of losing their autonomy, and this fear triggers a flight response when emotional closeness arises. The need to preserve their independence often translates into pushing partners away when the relationship becomes too emotionally intense.</span></p><p><b>Difficulty with Vulnerability:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> For someone with an avoidant attachment style, vulnerability can feel like stepping into a minefield. Their nervous system has learned that emotional closeness equals emotional pain. Therefore, they suppress their feelings, convinced that being open will lead to rejection or disappointment.</span></p><p><b>Conflict Avoidance:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> When issues arise in the relationship, avoidant individuals may choose to shut down rather than engage. The very thought of emotional confrontation can trigger a fight-or-flight response in their nervous system. They may avoid difficult conversations, leaving problems unresolved and causing emotional distance to deepen.</span></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Cycle of Emotional Withdrawal</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The cycle of emotional disconnection in relationships with an avoidant partner is often self-perpetuating. When an avoidant person withdraws, their partner typically tries to close the emotional gap, seeking more connection. But this only amplifies the avoidant person’s sense of overwhelm, leading them to retreat further. This back-and-forth can create significant tension and frustration on both sides, as the avoidant individual becomes more distant, and the partner feels rejected and unimportant.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This dynamic is a direct result of the nervous system’s response to emotional intimacy. For the avoidant person, their body and mind have been conditioned to see emotional closeness as a threat—something to be avoided at all costs. This is where the concept of containment comes in. In healthy relationships, both partners can provide each other with emotional containment, creating a safe space where vulnerability can be slowly explored and emotional needs can be met. Without this containment, avoidant individuals are more likely to withdraw, reinforcing the cycle of emotional disconnection.</span></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Role of Nervous System Regulation</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">One of the key pieces of healing avoidant attachment lies in nervous system regulation. The nervous system of someone with avoidant attachment has been shaped by early experiences of emotional neglect, leaving them with a “hyper-aroused” or “shut down” nervous system when it comes to emotional intimacy. Learning to regulate the nervous system through practices like mindfulness, deep breathing, and somatic experiencing can help individuals with avoidant attachment break free from this response.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Nervous system regulation is about learning to manage overwhelming emotions rather than suppressing them. By intentionally calming the nervous system, avoidant individuals can slowly shift their response to intimacy from withdrawal to connection. Practices like grounding, deep breathing, and other self-soothing techniques help to create a calm and contained emotional space, making it easier to stay present during vulnerable moments with a partner.</span></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Boundaries and Containment: The Key to Healing</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">An important part of emotional healing for avoidant individuals is learning how to set and respect boundaries—both for themselves and in relationships. This is a critical aspect of containment. Setting boundaries allows individuals to feel safe enough to engage in emotional intimacy at their own pace, without feeling overwhelmed.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In relationships, it’s vital to have a partner who understands the importance of boundaries and who can offer containment without becoming overwhelmed themselves. A partner who respects emotional space while also being present can help the avoidant individual feel safe enough to explore vulnerability and intimacy.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">For someone with avoidant attachment, this might look like communicating openly about what feels comfortable and what feels like too much. For example, an avoidant partner might need space after an emotional conversation or might need time to process feelings before sharing them. By honouring these boundaries and allowing emotional regulation to take place, both partners can create a healthier dynamic of trust and emotional closeness.</span></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Healing the Avoidant Attachment Style</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">While avoidant attachment presents unique challenges, healing is absolutely possible. The key is to gradually build emotional awareness, practice vulnerability, and incorporate emotional regulation techniques into daily life. Here are a few steps that can aid in the healing process:</span></p><p><b>Develop Emotional Awareness:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> The first step is becoming aware of one’s emotions. Practising mindfulness, journaling, or talking with a therapist can help avoidant individuals become more in tune with their feelings and better able to communicate them to others.</span></p><p><b>Start Small with Vulnerability:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Opening up emotionally may feel like a threat, but vulnerability is essential for intimacy. Begin with small steps—sharing a feeling, expressing a thought—and gradually increase emotional openness. Over time, these small actions will help desensitise the nervous system to emotional closeness.</span></p><p><b>Therapy and Somatic Practices:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Therapy, especially attachment-based or trauma-informed therapy, can be an essential part of healing avoidant attachment. Therapy can help explore the root causes of emotional withdrawal and introduce techniques for nervous system regulation, like breathing exercises or body-based practices (such as yoga or somatic experiencing), that help the individual reconnect to their emotions safely.</span></p><p><b>Create Safe Relationships:</b><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Building healthy relationships based on respect, boundaries, and containment is essential for healing. A partner who understands the avoidant style and can provide emotional space will help foster a sense of safety and security, making emotional intimacy possible.</span></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">It’s Never Too Late to Heal</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Avoidant attachment is often the result of early emotional neglect, and it can create significant challenges in adult relationships. However, with a focus on nervous system regulation, emotional containment, and healthy boundaries, individuals with avoidant attachment can learn to build secure and emotionally fulfilling relationships. It’s never too late to begin healing—by creating safe spaces, practising vulnerability, and managing emotions, individuals can break the cycle of emotional withdrawal and build stronger, more connected relationships.</span></p><p> </p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">References</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Porges, S.W. (1995) ‘Orienting in a defensive world: Mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A Polyvagal Theory’, Psychophysiology. Received March 6, 1995; Accepted March 23, 1995, 32(4), pp. 301–318. </span><a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01213.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01213.x</span></a></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Porges, S.W. (2003) ‘Social engagement and attachment: a phylogenetic perspective’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1008(1), pp. 31–47</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br /></span><a href="https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1196/annals.1301.004" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1196/annals.1301.004</span></a></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Sagone E, Commodari E, Indiana ML, La Rosa VL. (2003) Exploring the Association between Attachment Style, Psychological Well-Being, and Relationship Status in Young Adults and Adults-A Cross-Sectional Study. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br /></span><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10047625/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10047625/</span></a></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Sheinbaum T, Kwapil TR, Ballespí S, Mitjavila M, Chun CA, Silvia PJ, Barrantes-Vidal N. Attachment style predicts affect, cognitive appraisals, and social functioning in daily life. Front Psychology. </span><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4364085/#:~:text=In%20contrast%2C%20compared%20to%20secure,differentiate%20less%20between%20close%20and" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4364085/#:~:text=In%20contrast%2C%20compared%20to%20secure,differentiate%20less%20between%20close%20and</span></a></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Wardecker, B.M., Chopik, W.J., Moors, A.C., Edelstein, R.S. (2016). Avoidant Attachment Style. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer. </span><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2015-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_2015-1</span></a></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/how-attachment-styles-influence-relationships-avoidant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Relationships Can Help Heal Trauma, Under the Right Conditions: A Polyvagal Perspective</title>
		<link>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/relationships-can-help-heal-trauma-under-the-right-conditions-a-polyvagal-perspective/</link>
					<comments>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/relationships-can-help-heal-trauma-under-the-right-conditions-a-polyvagal-perspective/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Fry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 10:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapy Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attachment Styles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous System Dysregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polyvagal Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vagus Nerve]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.benjaminfry.co.uk/?p=1500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Trauma can leave deep emotional scars, often affecting how people connect with others. When the nervous system is dysregulated from past trauma, it becomes challenging to form healthy, secure relationships. However, with the right conditions—like trust, boundaries, and emotional containment—relationships can help heal trauma. The Polyvagal Theory, which explains how our nervous system responds to [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trauma can leave deep emotional scars, often affecting how people connect with others. When the nervous system is dysregulated from past trauma, it becomes challenging to form healthy, secure relationships. However, with the right conditions—like trust, boundaries, and emotional containment—relationships can help heal trauma. The Polyvagal Theory, which explains how our nervous system responds to stress, is key to understanding how we can use relationships to heal.</p>
<h2>How Trauma Affects the Nervous System</h2>
<p>For trauma survivors, the nervous system often remains stuck in fight-or-flight or freeze modes (sympathetic or dorsal vagal), making it hard to feel safe, seen and calm in relationships. The good news is that with the right kind of relationship, it’s possible to move toward healing by re-regulating the nervous system.</p>
<p>Trauma doesn’t just live in our memories—it reshapes how our nervous system operates <a href="https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.76.s2.17" target="_blank" rel="noopener">(Porges, 2009).</a> After overwhelming or threatening experiences, the autonomic nervous system (ANS), which controls our physiological responses to safety and danger, can become chronically dysregulated. This dysregulation makes it difficult for trauma survivors to feel safe in their bodies or in connection with others, even long after the traumatic event has passed (Porges, 2011).</p>
<p>According to the Polyvagal Theory, developed by Dr Stephen Porges, the ANS has three main states:</p>
<p><b>Ventral Vagal (Safety and Connection): </b>We feel regulated, calm, socially engaged, and capable of trusting others.</p>
<p><b>Sympathetic (Fight or Flight): </b>Activated in the face of perceived danger, this state readies the body for action: heart rate increases, muscles tense, and we become hyper-alert or anxious.</p>
<p><b>Dorsal Vagal (Shutdown or Freeze): </b>When escape or defence feels impossible, the system can collapse into immobility, leading to numbness, emotional withdrawal, and disconnection.</p>
<p>For many trauma survivors, the nervous system can become &#8220;stuck&#8221; in chronic sympathetic activation (anxiety, agitation, hypervigilance) or dorsal vagal shutdown (numbness, depression, dissociation). These states are adaptive, meaning they were once necessary for survival, but over time they can disrupt relationships, emotional expression, and a sense of self <a href="https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.76.s2.17" target="_blank" rel="noopener">(Porges, 2009).</a></p>
<p>Healing is possible, and relationships can play a powerful role. When we experience safe, attuned connections that include trust, consistent boundaries, and emotional containment, our nervous system can begin to shift. Over time, these experiences help rewire the brain and body for connection over protection, allowing us to return to a state of regulation <a href="https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1301.004." target="_blank" rel="noopener">(Porges 2003)</a>.</p>
<p>This is why trauma-informed therapeutic relationships—and personal relationships grounded in safety—are essential in helping people move from survival into healing.</p>
<h2>Co-Regulation in Relationships</h2>
<p>In a healthy, supportive relationship, two people can help regulate each other’s emotions—a process known as co-regulation <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912451630" target="_blank" rel="noopener">(Butler &amp; Randal, 2012)</a>. When one partner is feeling overwhelmed or anxious, the other can offer calmness, empathy, and support. This helps to shift the nervous system from a state of fear or stress into one of safety and connection. Through this process, both individuals can begin to heal their nervous systems and move toward healthier emotional states.</p>
<h2>Safety, Boundaries, and Emotional Containment</h2>
<p>For trauma survivors, the first step in healing is feeling safe. This goes beyond just physical safety—it means creating emotional security. Trauma can make people feel constantly on edge, hypervigilant, or unable to trust others. In a relationship that prioritises clear boundaries and containment, the nervous system can begin to settle.</p>
<p>Setting boundaries allows individuals to feel safe because they know what to expect from each other. Healthy boundaries communicate respect and trust, which helps to regulate emotions. Without boundaries, the nervous system remains on high alert, but with them, there’s room for relaxation and connection.</p>
<h2>Empathy and Compassion: Healing Together</h2>
<p>One of the most powerful ways relationships can help heal trauma is through empathy. When partners can understand and respond to each other’s emotional states with care and compassion, they activate the ventral vagal system, which encourages calm and connection. A simple, empathetic response, such as listening without judgment or offering comforting words, can help soothe a dysregulated nervous system and restore a sense of safety.</p>
<h2>Vulnerability and Open Communication</h2>
<p>Open communication and vulnerability are essential in healing from trauma. When a partner feels heard, seen, and understood, their nervous system can shift from sensing threat into a state of calm. Vulnerability in relationships means expressing feelings honestly and being open about emotional needs. This not only builds trust but also fosters an environment where both partners feel safe to share their experiences, taking responsibility for what is theirs while remaining open and accepting of the others’ boundaries.</p>
<p>It can be difficult to communicate when we feel triggered, but having a partner who listens without judgment makes a huge difference. It’s through this kind of communication that relationships evolve into safe spaces where both people can heal.</p>
<h2>Containment: Holding Space for Each Other</h2>
<p>In the healing process, containment refers to the ability to hold space for another person’s emotions without trying to fix them or rush the process. Trauma survivors often need emotional space to express their feelings, and this process is best supported when the other partner is calm and non-reactive.</p>
<p>A relationship that offers empathy, support, and emotional containment can provide the perfect environment for trauma survivors to heal. These relationships allow individuals to shift their nervous systems from chronic stress states into a more grounded, safe space where true emotional connection can take place. Over time, with mutual care and effort, trauma survivors can rebuild their ability to trust, connect, and experience emotional intimacy.</p>
<h2>It’s Never Too Late to Begin Healing</h2>
<p>No matter how much time has passed or how entrenched trauma feels, it is never too late to begin healing through healthy relationships. By learning how to co-regulate, set boundaries, communicate openly, and contain each other’s emotions, individuals can create relationships that promote emotional healing.</p>
<p>Healing from trauma takes patience and effort, but the power of a supportive relationship cannot be underestimated. With the right tools, such as emotional containment and nervous system regulation, relationships become a space where both partners can grow, heal, and create deeper, more meaningful connections. Trauma doesn’t have to define the way we relate to others, and with the right foundation, it’s possible to build the kind of relationship that promotes healing, safety, and emotional resilience.</p>
<h2>References</h2>
<p>Butler, E.A., &amp; Randall, A.K. (2012). Emotional Coregulation in Close Relationships. Emotion Review, 5(2), 202-210. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912451630" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912451630</a></p>
<p>Porges, S.W. (1995) ‘Orienting in a defensive world: Mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A Polyvagal Theory’, Psychophysiology. Received March 6, 1995; Accepted March 23, 1995, 32(4), pp. 301–318. Available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01213.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01213.x</a>.</p>
<p>Porges, S.W. (2003) ‘Social engagement and attachment: a phylogenetic perspective’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1008(1), pp. 31–47. Available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1301.004" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1301.004</a>.</p>
<p>Porges S.W. (2009). The polyvagal theory: new insights into adaptive reactions of the autonomic nervous system. Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine, 76 Suppl 2(Suppl 2), S86–S90. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.76.s2.17" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.76.s2.17</a></p>
<p>Porges, S.W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. W.W. Norton.</p>


<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/relationships-can-help-heal-trauma-under-the-right-conditions-a-polyvagal-perspective/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Attachment Styles Influence Relationships: Anxious Attachment</title>
		<link>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/how-attachment-styles-influence-relationships-anxious-attachment/</link>
					<comments>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/how-attachment-styles-influence-relationships-anxious-attachment/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Fry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 11:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Attachment Styles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinician Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous System Dysregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polyvagal Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapy Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vagus Nerve]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.benjaminfry.co.uk/?p=1493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Attachment theory, introduced by John Bowlby, sheds light on the profound impact that early childhood relationships have on our emotional and psychological development (Bowlby, 1988). Central to this theory is the idea that our earliest connections with our caregivers &#8211; usually our mothers &#8211; lay the groundwork for how we will relate to others throughout [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="1493" class="elementor elementor-1493" data-elementor-post-type="post">
						<section class="elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-9d9291f elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default" data-id="9d9291f" data-element_type="section" data-e-type="section">
						<div class="elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default">
					<div class="elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-5d044f7" data-id="5d044f7" data-element_type="column" data-e-type="column">
			<div class="elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated">
						<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-612191a elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="612191a" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Attachment theory, introduced by John Bowlby, sheds light on the profound impact that early childhood relationships have on our emotional and psychological development </span><a href="https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=556378" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Bowlby, 1988)</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Central to this theory is the idea that our earliest connections with our caregivers &#8211; usually our mothers &#8211; lay the groundwork for how we will relate to others throughout our lives. In particular, the anxious attachment style &#8211; which often stems from inconsistent caregiving &#8211; can have a lasting influence on relationships, especially when it comes to emotional regulation and healing after trauma.</span></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Roots of Anxious Attachment: Trauma and Emotional Regulation</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Anxious attachment often emerges from attachment trauma—when a caregiver’s emotional availability is unpredictable. For a child, this inconsistency in caregiving creates confusion, anxiety, and a fear of abandonment. At the core of anxious attachment is the child’s difficulty regulating their own emotional responses because they were not consistently soothed in their early years. Over time, the child learns that in order to feel safe, they must alter their behaviour to make sure they receive love.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This causes nervous system dysregulation, which affects the child’s ability to self-soothe and manage emotions in future relationships. Emotional resilience after trauma can be a challenging skill to develop, but it is essential for healing anxious attachment and improving relationship dynamics.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">As adults, those of us with an anxious attachment style may find it difficult to regulate our emotions in relationships, especially when we fear rejection or abandonment </span><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6920243/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Lahousen et al., 2018).</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> This can manifest as a seemingly irrational need for closeness or validation, both of which are rooted in the need to feel emotionally secure. However, this behavior often causes tension in relationships, as the intense demand for reassurance can overwhelm our partners, creating a cycle of anxiety and emotional distress.</span></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Why Anxiously Attached Individuals Repeat Unhealthy Cycles</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">One of the most challenging aspects of anxious attachment is the tendency to repeat harmful relationship patterns </span><a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769584/full" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Speranza et al., 2022).</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Those of us with anxious attachments often find ourselves in relationships that reinforce our fears of abandonment, creating a cycle that feels impossible to break. The reason we attract the same relationships, whether with emotionally unavailable partners or people who are inconsistent in their love and care, can be traced back to unresolved attachment trauma.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The inner child often remains unconsciously drawn to relationships that mirror early trauma, as this is familiar, even if it’s painful. This can lead to the repeating of toxic relationship patterns—whether through choosing emotionally distant partners, remaining in unhealthy relationships, or trying to fix someone else’s emotional wounds as a way to avoid facing our own.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Breaking these cycles is a critical part of healing anxious attachment. It requires not only emotional regulation but also a shift in the way we perceive our own self-worth in relationships. Healing emotional abandonment wounds and rebuilding trust after childhood trauma are essential parts of this process. As we heal our attachment wounds, we begin to form healthier, more secure relationships which are based on mutual trust and emotional availability rather than fear and insecurity.</span></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Healing Attachment Trauma: Overcoming Anxious Attachment in Relationships</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Healing attachment trauma is a difficult but achievable process that involves understanding the roots of our anxious attachment and learning how to create more secure emotional bonds. The foundation of this healing often begins with therapy, particularly trauma-informed therapy, which helps us understand how early attachment wounds shape our present-day behaviors. For those of us with anxious attachment, this means learning how to regulate our emotions and break free from toxic relationship patterns.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Understanding the Polyvagal Theory can also help healing. According to the Polyvagal Theory, the nervous system plays a critical role in our ability to feel safe and connected </span><a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01213.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Porges, 1995)</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">. Learning to regulate the nervous system through tools like breathwork, mindfulness, and grounding techniques can significantly impact how we relate to others. This type of work helps regulate the nervous system by allowing those of us with trauma to shift out of a survival state and create more secure, grounded connections </span><a href="https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1196/annals.1301.004" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">(Porges, 2003).</span></a></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Personal Healing and Growth: Rebuilding Trust and Self-Worth</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">For adults with anxious attachment, understanding how trauma affects self-worth in relationships is an essential step in the healing journey. Those with anxious attachment often struggle with feelings of inadequacy and a fear that they are unworthy of love or attention. These negative beliefs about ourselves are rooted in early attachment experiences where our emotional needs were either inconsistently met or ignored. This, in turn, can lead to a lack of self-worth and difficulty trusting others.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Therapy plays a pivotal role in helping people process past trauma, develop emotional resilience, challenge these negative beliefs, and build healthy relationships. Healing attachment trauma is not just about learning to regulate emotions; it’s about learning to trust our own inner worth and ability to create lasting, secure connections.</span></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Path Toward Secure Attachment: Trauma-Informed Therapy and Healing</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Healing from anxious attachment requires patience, commitment, and a willingness to understand abandonment fears. By learning strategies in nervous system regulation and focusing on healthy boundaries and containment, daily life can become more manageable and gradually, attachment wounds will begin to heal. By recognising how early attachment experiences influence our emotional responses, we can teach ourselves strategies for regulating emotions in relationships.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Practices like mindfulness, meditation, and breathwork can help those of us with anxious attachment learn to regulate our nervous systems, reducing anxiety and creating space for healthier relationship dynamics. These practices, or tools, can help us become more attuned to our bodily sensations and emotions, grounding us and allowing us to create a stronger sense of safety within ourselves and our relationships.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">By committing to self-healing, breaking unhealthy patterns, and learning to regulate emotions, those with anxious attachment can begin to build the emotional resilience needed for healthy, loving relationships. Overcoming anxious attachment is not only about healing past wounds but also about creating a future where one can feel secure, loved, and truly connected to others.</span></p><h2><span style="font-weight: 400;">Transforming Attachment, Transforming Relationships</span></h2><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">With boundaries, containment, and strategies for nervous system regulation, we can prevent past trauma from overwhelming the present. Those with anxious attachment can break free from patterns of emotional instability and create deeper, more meaningful connections with others. The key lies in creating trust &#8211; in both oneself and others &#8211; and in learning how to self-soothe in ways that are healthy, grounded, and sustainable. It’s through this process that individuals with anxious attachment can move toward secure, loving relationships and emotional healing after trauma.</span></p><h3><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br />References<br /><br /></span></h3><p><span style="font-size: 16px; font-weight: 400;">Bowlby, J. (1969) Attachment and Loss: Volume 1. Attachment, New York, Basic Books.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bowlby, J. (1973) Attachment and Loss: Volume 2. Separation: Anxiety and Anger, New York, Basic Books.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Bowlby, J. (1988) A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development, New York, Basic Books.</span></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lahousen T, Unterrainer HF, Kapfhammer HP. Psychobiology of Attachment and Trauma-Some General Remarks From a Clinical Perspective. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 12;10:914. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00914. PMID: 31920761; PMCID: PMC6920243.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br /></span><a href="https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6920243/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6920243/</span></a></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">PORGES, S.W. (1995) ‘Orienting in a defensive world: Mammalian modifications of our evolutionary heritage. A Polyvagal Theory’, Psychophysiology. Received March 6, 1995; Accepted March 23, 1995, 32(4), pp. 301–318. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br /></span><a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01213.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb01213.x</span></a></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Porges, S.W. (2003) ‘Social engagement and attachment: a phylogenetic perspective’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1008(1), pp. 31–47.</span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br /></span><a href="https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1196/annals.1301.004" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1196/annals.1301.004</span></a></p><p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Speranza, A.M. </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">et al.</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;"> (2022) ‘The role of complex trauma and attachment patterns in intimate partner violence’, </span><i><span style="font-weight: 400;">Frontiers in Psychology</span></i><span style="font-weight: 400;">, 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769584. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;"><br /></span><a href="https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769584/full" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769584/full</span></a></p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
		</div>
					</div>
		</section>
				</div>
		]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/how-attachment-styles-influence-relationships-anxious-attachment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Hidden Presence of Trauma in Our Relationships</title>
		<link>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/the-hidden-presence-of-trauma-in-our-relationships/</link>
					<comments>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/the-hidden-presence-of-trauma-in-our-relationships/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Fry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 14:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous System Dysregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polyvagal Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vagus Nerve]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.benjaminfry.co.uk/?p=1478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Often without knowing it, our trauma, or “baggage,” is present in almost every connection we make. Our unresolved, unfinished business from the times when we felt threatened or overwhelmed stays with us, affecting the way we deal with human connection and relationships. Our baggage can often make connection feel like walking through a storm. Those [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Often without knowing it, our trauma, or “baggage,” is present in almost every connection we make. Our unresolved, unfinished business from the times when we felt threatened or overwhelmed stays with us, affecting the way we deal with human connection and relationships. Our baggage can often make connection feel like walking through a storm. Those of us with trauma often can feel threatened when there is no clear threat—like running from an invisible lion. From a nervous system perspective, our baggage is both our greatest potential for growth and a significant source of discomfort. Facing it can feel like stepping into the eye of a storm, revisiting the very experiences that once left us raw. But with awareness and understanding, confronting and working through our trauma allows us to join the path back to safety, balance, and regulation. That said, it’s something that needs to be handled with great care.</p>
<h2>What Is Our Baggage?</h2>
<p>Baggage isn’t just some abstract thing we carry around. It’s the remnants of past emotional responses—those moments when we felt too much, too deeply and didn’t have the space or tools to process it. Our reactions to these threats—whether they were real or perceived—became a part of our nervous system’s default settings, shaping how we interact with the world. Even though we may not realise it, every time we try to connect with someone, this baggage has a way of sneaking in and influencing how we interact. This can manifest in many ways.</p>
<h2>Fear of Rejection: An Invisible Trigger</h2>
<p>Our baggage can cause us to fear rejection, often in ways we don’t recognise. Past experiences of abandonment or being hurt can leave an emotional scar, and those scars work overtime, triggering the same feelings every time we sense potential for rejection. The thought that someone might not choose us can feel like an overwhelming threat, not just a disappointment. So, we prepare ourselves by closing off, distancing ourselves, or pulling away. While this is supposed to protect us, it actually robs us of the chance to open ourselves to true connection.</p>
<h2>Trust Issues: The Fragility of Connection</h2>
<p>Trust is very important for connection, but when past betrayals or broken promises are lodged in our nervous system, trust becomes fragile. Every potential relationship is filtered through the lens of previous disappointments. Every offhand comment or shift in behaviour is a potential trigger for the same old anxieties, making it hard to open up. The lack of trust feels like constant pressure, making any attempt at connection feel less like a safe space and more like a minefield. We walk on eggshells, afraid to cross a line, and as a result, the connection remains surface-level and guarded.</p>
<h2>Overprotectiveness: Defending Against the Past</h2>
<p>Baggage can cause us to become overprotective. When we’ve been hurt in the past, we become hyper-aware of every small detail, overanalysing every gesture and word. “This reminds me of the last person who hurt me, so this could end up in the same way.” This unconscious connection between the past and present can quickly turn innocent interactions into potential threats, leaving us unable to engage fully with others. Instead of seeing the person in front of us as they are, we see a reflection of our past wounds, which can prevent us from ever truly engaging.</p>
<h2>The Challenge of Vulnerability and Intimacy</h2>
<p>When we have felt overwhelmed in the past, we learn to build walls as a defence mechanism. We hide our true selves, guarding our authentic emotions for fear of getting hurt. But while it may seem protective, it has the opposite effect. We keep our real selves locked away, only allowing others to connect with the version of us that we create in order to keep us safe. This doesn’t allow for real depth or vulnerability. The more we guard ourselves, the more isolated we become, even though all we really want and need is to feel true connection.</p>
<p>Real intimacy requires vulnerability, but our baggage makes it very difficult to be vulnerable. Connection is about opening up and letting someone in. It’s about being able to show the parts of you that you’ve kept hidden, without fear. When our past experiences with intimacy were painful or disappointing, we start to see it as something dangerous rather than something connecting. The thought of someone getting too close feels overwhelming, so we hold back, avoid, or deflect. True closeness feels like a risk—one that might just lead to being hurt again.</p>
<h2>The Cycle of Conflict: Unresolved Issues at Play</h2>
<p>Baggage doesn’t just show up in the way we relate emotionally—it also shows up in how we deal with conflict. If we haven’t resolved our past issues, we tend to repeat them in new relationships. The slightest disagreement might spiral into something bigger because unresolved issues create patterns we don’t even recognise. We find ourselves reliving old battles—fighting over things that often have very little to do with the issue at hand. The result is a disconnection that feels cyclical and exhausting as if we’re never really able to move forward.</p>
<h2>Transforming Baggage Into Growth</h2>
<p>Our baggage is always going to be with us. It’s a part of who we are. But the good news is, it doesn’t have to dictate how we connect with others. With boundaries, containment, and strategies for nervous system regulation we can prevent past trauma from overwhelming the present. Clear boundaries create space and safety, allowing us to engage with others without feeling emotionally flooded. Containment helps manage the intense energy triggered by unresolved trauma, preventing under or over-reactions that feel distressing to you, and your partner.</p>
<p>Working on nervous system regulation can reduce reactivity and create space for connection. Healing isn’t about eliminating past wounds but learning to navigate them with self-awareness and the tools for internal stability.</p>
<p>When we integrate these tools, we move beyond survival mode and into healthier, more fulfilling relationships. By understanding our own nervous system and setting boundaries that protect us, we create relationships based on safety and authenticity, rather than fear and reactivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/the-hidden-presence-of-trauma-in-our-relationships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re-Regulating our Nervous System using our Senses</title>
		<link>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/41-re-regulating-our-nervous-system-using-our-senses/</link>
					<comments>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/41-re-regulating-our-nervous-system-using-our-senses/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Fry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2020 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Therapy Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous System Dysregulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polyvagal Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vagus Nerve]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.benjaminfry.co.uk/41-re-regulating-our-nervous-system-using-our-senses/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In freeing ourselves from a dysregulated nervous system, an important step is learning how to reframe our experiences and manage our triggers, reactions, and baggage. We need to do this so that we are no longer subject to learned ways of behaviour that negatively impact our lives and the relationships we have with others. The [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In freeing ourselves from a dysregulated nervous system, an important step is learning how to reframe our experiences and manage our triggers, reactions, and baggage. We need to do this so that we are no longer subject to learned ways of behaviour that negatively impact our lives and the relationships we have with others.</p>
<p>The goal is to go from the diagram on the left below to the one on the right.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-760 aligncenter" src="https://benjaminfry.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/jpg-0037.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></p>
<p>In the diagram on the left, in which our baggage is represented by the red squiggle, triggers are the green arrow, and our reaction is the red arrow, you can see a dysregulated nervous system &#8211; one that overreacts to the trigger. The diagram on the right represents a nervous system that is well regulated as a result of using boundaries and containment.</p>
<p>To reframe our experiences, we must bring attention to our triggers, our baggage, and our reactions. It’s easy to consider ourselves the victim in situations that trigger us and make us feel unsafe, but there is very little we can do to control what life throws at us. What we can do, however, is use boundaries and containment to lessen the impact that our triggers have on our baggage. When we do this, we create something like a shield around that vulnerable, wounded part of ourselves.</p>
<p>If we want to re-regulate our nervous system and leave that state of dysregulation, we need to connect with our bodies, and allow our reptilian and mammalian brains to finish dealing with our unfinished business, the root cause of our dysregulation.</p>
<p>If we are going to disengage the thinking brain and activate the mammal brain, it’s not very easy to do that while reading words. We need to go instead into the part of the brain that’s aware of sensations, which show up in our five senses; touch, sight, smell, sound and taste. They are experienced, not thought about or read about.</p>
<p>So, this step in freeing ourselves from dysregulation sees us using the sensations from our own body as a bridge through time. That’s right; we’re going time-travelling, back towards the original trigger that created your baggage. You are going to visit the reaction was so strong that you had to pause it. You never completely un-paused it, so the reaction is unfinished and remains dormant in your nervous system. Using sensation to time-travel back to that experience is the first step to resolving it.</p>
<p>Essentially, you are including in your awareness today an awareness of this same experience before today. It’s just a bigger window of awareness we’re opening up going from the now to the now-and-then. This time-travel is done by your body. No thinking required.</p>
<p>The nervous system is linked to the event in the past, as if it is happening right now. So you just have to train your body to listen to your nervous system, and your mind to listen to your body. With the right preparatory work, you can tap into this magical somatic dialogue at any time.</p>
<p>Let’s use a practical example to get a better understanding of how we can connect with ourselves and discharge our baggage.</p>
<p><em>John has agreed to pick up Mary from a work drinks event and take her to a dinner with his friends. He’s supposed to collect her at 7pm. At 6.55pm, she tells everyone she has to go, gets ready and is expecting him. He doesn’t show up. There’s no call, no message, nothing. As she’s waiting by the lobby of the bar, some of her colleagues leave together and comment that they thought she’d left. They ask her if she’s ok. Mary smiles bravely and tells them that everything’s fine. But inside she’s dying. She has no idea what’s going on and having played it all cool, like she had to leave because she had another event to go to, now she’s the one standing on her own looking foolish. It doesn’t help that one of the people passing her in the lobby is her work nemesis! John finally turns up at 7.50pm. Mary is still waiting, but not exactly pleased to see him. As he walks into the bar, all flustered, and greets her, she must make a choice in what to say.</em></p>
<p>When talking about her triggers, Mary would respond well to this situation by saying:</p>
<p><em>‘When we agree to meet at 7pm and you show up at 7.50pm, that’s a trigger for me.’</em></p>
<p>In doing so, Mary makes her response about her and her own triggers, not about John. Mary could add to the communication about the trigger by also including a good description of the reaction.</p>
<p><em>And now I notice that I feel very angry, upset, hurt, confused and scared. My stomach is tight, and everything feels hot in my abdomen. I don’t feel safe.</em></p>
<p>Once you have carefully identified your trigger, and diligently noticed and safely articulated your reaction, it’s time to open up the bit in the middle, the bit that links the trigger to that reaction. For Mary, that looks something like this:</p>
<p><em>“When we agree to meet at 7pm and you show up a 7.50pm that’s a trigger for me. And now I notice that I feel very angry, upset, hurt, confused and scared. My stomach is tight, and everything feels hot in my abdomen. I don’t feel safe. This reminds me of when I was always waiting for my Mum. She was always late for me when I was younger.”</em></p>
<p>What does this help Mary to learn about herself now as an adult? She has an over-reaction to people she cares about being late for her. She obviously has some work to do on this, but in the meantime, how can she keep the triggers to a minimum, so that this work is easier to do? She can ask John to help:</p>
<p><em>“So, in the future it would really help me if you could be on time, or let me know if there’s a problem as early as possible. And what I will do to help myself is if you are late and I’m getting uncomfortable, I will just go home.”</em></p>
<p>In this story, Mary has successfully identified her trigger, manages her reaction, and opens up about her baggage. She then let’s John know about her boundaries, which he can then, if he chooses, collaborate with Mary on keeping them. By simply letting people know what your boundaries are, they may find it easier to help.</p>
<p>Imagine in this example that she’s not saying this to John now, but she’s actually working through this on her own, or with a friend or even a therapist. She now wants to use this statement describing the sensations she felt to do some work on her nervous system, to get better at handling these kinds of triggering events in the future.</p>
<p>So, while remembering what it felt like when she was waiting for John, Mary goes into her body and looks for sensations. She has already noticed that her stomach is tight and everything feels hot in her abdomen. Now is her chance to go towards those feelings, not away from them. The goal here is to stop analysing and to allow the experience to start to take over.</p>
<p>Once we find these sensations and focus clearly on them, we have a very important question to ask. This question is not asked of the mind; it is asked to the body. You might feel like this makes no sense at all, but just go with me here. It works. I’ve seen it work hundreds of times. What it really comes down to is just a trick of language, but it means something to us all in a way that’s hard to describe with words. You will know it when you feel it.</p>
<p>Once you have a clear awareness of your sensations as you recall the trigger, reaction and your baggage. Now is when you ask your body this question:</p>
<p>“Can you float that back in time and see where it goes?”</p>
<p>And then you let that hang there for a while. You might want to repeat it. Your body might resist answering. Your thinking brain might be desperately trying to get in on the act. Come back to your sensations, back to your body. Its initial response might be to draw a blank.</p>
<p>That’s OK; hang out with blank for a while. If you stay with it, eventually something will happen. Something will pop up on the radar.</p>
<p>Sometimes we think it doesn’t make sense and so we resist it. Go with whatever comes up, however crazy it may seem. The memory might be an unwelcome one and your mind might tell you not to go there, but the reality is that your body is already there. It’s not a memory anymore; it’s something happening right here right now. So, there’s no point listening to your mind telling you not to go there. You are there. And now you have a way out.</p>
<p>The most important thing here is to respect the pace at which your body wants to work. There is nothing to be gained by rushing anything. The body can’t do more than it can do when healing anything, whether it’s a broken toe or a dysregulated nervous system. It takes the time it takes. So if you need to, give yourself permission to do this slowly, carefully, in stages.</p>
<p>You can download this post in a handy 2-page PDF to print and share with friends, family, clients or colleagues. Follow <a href="https://35f5ee82-fa8b-482f-b083-13796b54c83d.usrfiles.com/ugd/35f5ee_f3f38164b4724e53a41ae3d78fc0d5cc.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><u>this link to download now</u></a>.</p>
<p>You can buy a copy of The Invisible Lion now on kindle or paperback from your local Amazon store. Just <a href="http://a-fwd.to/6RHDWGq" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><u>click here to buy now</u></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://benjaminfry.co.uk/post/41-re-regulating-our-nervous-system-using-our-senses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
